At Stemple Law, our professional focus extends far beyond asbestos-related cases. We have a proven track record in litigating cases related to various toxic substances, including nuclear radiation, harmful pesticides, and dangerous chemicals. With a multi-faceted approach that often involves collaboration with specialized law firms, we pursue justice for those affected by negligence, misconduct, or failure to warn on the part of companies or government entities. Whether you have suffered personal injuries, lost a loved one, or have concerns about property contamination, our firm is here to hold the responsible parties accountable and help secure the compensation you deserve.

Other Toxic Substances

Take a Stand Against Toxic Injustice

With decades of experience litigating against large multinational corporations and governmental entities, we are committed to fighting for your rights. If you or a loved one has been adversely affected by nuclear radiation, chemical exposure, environmental contamination, benzene, dioxins, etc., you are not alone.

Other Litigation Projects

  • The Castle Bravo detonation in Bikini Atoll, Marshall Islands

    1979 – 1986: The Marshall Islands Atomic Testing Litigation Project

    We represented nearly 4,000 individual Marshall Islanders with personal injury claims in the Federal District Court in Los Angeles and about 13,000 with 5th Amendment Property Taking claims in the U.S. Claims Court. Their losses were caused by the U.S. nuclear testing of 67 atomic and one Hydrogen bomb (Bravo in 1954) between 1946 and 1958. The U.S. argued citizens of the Trust Territory of the Pacific were not entitled to 5th Amendment protection because they were not Americans. The Claims Court disagreed, deciding the United States Bill of Rights applies where the U.S. acts. A treaty called the Compact of Free Association (§177) required the Marshallese to give up their court claims when they voted in favor of becoming an independent republic.

  • An satellite image of Rongerik Atoll taken by NASA

    1981 – 1986: Survivors of Rongerik

    Our firm acted on behalf of 5 U.S. Air Force weathermen exposed to radiation during the 1954 Bravo test. They were stationed on Rongerik Atoll, 150 miles west and downwind of the Bravo detonation on Bikini Atoll. These cases highlighted governmental recklessness and a long-standing cover-up that continues.

  • A row of men in hazmat suits walking through a field of crops spraying pesticides

    1981 – 1986: The Toxic Substance Litigation Group

    We litigated against manufacturers of 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP), a chemical originally designed as a nerve agent for use in war, then repurposed for agricultural application after University of Hawaii scientists discovered it sterilized nematodes. These are small hollow worms that eat at crops in sandy soils, like pineapples. The defendant chemical companies claimed I was falsely causing our clients to experience emotional distress unreasonably. The trial Court and Appellate Court of Appeals agreed. In a landmark decision, the California Supreme Court disagreed and reversed the prior opinions.

    If you review the unanimous California Supreme Court decision in Mitchell v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 591, please pay special attention to the last two paragraphs of the opinion. This summarizes a pivotal part of what the fight was all about. Just click the Learn More tab immediately below.

  • A photo of a trunk surrounded by garbage and seagull inside of the Crazy Horse Landfill

    1984 – 1993: The Crazy Horse Landfill Case

    We secured significant compensatory and punitive damages for families whose groundwater was contaminated by harmful chemicals emanating from the nearby Crazy Horse landfill in Prunedale, CA, where a former Firestone Tire factory unlawfully disposed of its toxic waste. This was, in essence, a fear of cancer case. The Superior Court Award was the highest in the nation at that point in time for such a matter. The damages were reduced and remanded by the California Supreme Court in the Landmark case of Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 6 Cal 4th 965. Before the Appellate Court decided it, which could include a retrial, the case was resolved in a confidential settlement.

    (Photo courtesy of the Monterey Herald)

  • A cigarette burning inside of a glass ashtray on a black background

    1997 – 2002: Tobacco Victims Law Center

    In a pioneering effort, we collaborated with other law firms to hold the five major cigarette manufacturers responsible for healthcare costs incurred by the Republic of the Marshall Islands to treat smoking-related illnesses of its citizens. This is one of the first times these companies were required to defend in a jurisdiction outside the U.S. or the U.K.

A Selection of Other Toxic Substance Cases

  • Class Action to Lower Formaldehyde Emissions

    We brought a Class Action in California against major mobile and prefabricated housing manufacturers. Alleging that excessive formaldehyde levels in the laminated wood used in constructing them was causing purchasers to suffer severe allergic reactions. The case was settled. Subsequently, these companies agreed to lower formaldehyde emission levels for such housing they would in the future sell in California.

  • Asbestos Exposure

    Four law firms litigated on behalf of more than 100 California Superior Court staff members exposed to asbestos during remediation operations.

  • Airbourne Exposure to Pesticides (VOCs, PAHs & DDT)

    Four law firms represented approximately 200 people living in a northern California suburban community exposed to hazardous pesticides by way of air drift. Many residents had cancer.

  • Toxic Mold Exposures

    Throughout the pendency of the case, six law firms represented five professional government employees of a Fraud Investigations Unit. These investigators were exposed to toxic mold in a privately leased building used to provide them office space.

  • Acute Benzene Exposure

    Four law firms united to assume the representation of a professional woman shortly before trial. She suffered debilitating brain damage due to a single acute benzene exposure. The HVAC system was cleaned with the solvent while still turned on in an occupied governmental building.

  • There are more Legal Projects and Cases

    As time permits, when Gordon’s participation in other areas of toxic substance litigation or bad faith insurance issues become relevant to current events, especially of statewide or national interest, they will be added. Also, more information will be made available by way of the Blog.

Toxic Substance Litigation: Related News Coverage

Do You Have a Card Like This?

If you or a loved one have or had a Shipyard or Tire Worker card, it's more than a piece of laminated paper; it's a key to understanding your legal rights, especially amid changing statutes of limitations. Don't let an asbestos-related diagnosis catch you unprepared—your card could be a critical reminder, a piece of the puzzle for securing justice and compensation. You may still have viable rights to pursue.